One of the 63 fintech decks in this library is Coinbase's very first fundraising pitch — when it described itself, simply, as “your hosted bitcoin wallet.”

This library pulls together real fundraising decks from fintech startups across more than a decade — from Coinbase's earliest pitch to the licensed banks and payments infrastructure companies raising today.

It matters because fintech founders carry a burden software founders don't: before an investor will back the product, they need to believe the company can be trusted with somebody else's money.

Below, we look at what these decks do differently to earn that trust — and how the answer changes depending on whether you're moving money, holding it, or building the infrastructure underneath it.

Here's the full breakdown:

Inside you'll find:

Coinbase's actual 2013 deck — pictured above — leads with the logo and tagline, then goes straight into a screenshot of the real product: account balance, transaction history, a working browser and mobile view. Not a mockup, not a wireframe — the live interface.

→ Leading with the actual product screen, not a rendering of what it might look like someday, was the fastest way to answer the investor's first question: does this thing actually work?

What the deck leaves out is just as telling: no dedicated regulatory slide. In 2013, the compliance apparatus around crypto barely existed yet. That's the exception in this library, not the rule — and it's a useful reminder that a deck's structure reflects the regulatory reality of the moment it was written, not a fixed formula.

Across the decks in this collection, three things show up before the growth story gets to make its case:

→ In fintech, the founder-credibility slide is doing risk-underwriting work, not just introduction work — it's implicitly answering “why should a regulator, a banking partner, and a user all trust this specific team.”

Not every fintech deck is selling a wallet. Griffin's Series A deck, pictured below, pitches something structurally different: a bank, licensed so that other companies can build financial products on top of it.

That changes almost every slide. Griffin's customer isn't a consumer opening an account — it's another startup's engineering team integrating an API. The pitch shifts from “this app is easy to use” to “this infrastructure is safe to build a business on,” which is a different kind of trust argument entirely.

→ Infrastructure fintech decks spend more time on uptime, audit history, and regulatory relationships; consumer fintech decks spend more time on product screens and adoption numbers. Both are answering the same underlying question about trust — they just bring different evidence.

Regardless of stage — pre-seed to growth — almost every deck in this library includes some version of a licensing or regulatory-status slide: “licensed as X in Y jurisdictions,” “partnered with a chartered bank sponsor,” or “SOC 2 and PCI compliant since day one.”

Software companies rarely need this slide because using their product doesn't require anyone's money to move through it. The moment a startup touches payments, custody, or lending, that single fact adds a slide category that has nothing to do with product-market fit and everything to do with being allowed to operate at all.

The lesson isn't to copy Coinbase's product-screenshot-first approach or Griffin's infrastructure framing. It's to identify which kind of trust your specific model needs to establish — product trust, custody trust, or regulatory trust — and make sure that evidence appears before the growth numbers, not after.

Every company named above — plus more than 60 others spanning pre-seed to growth stage, from Square and Brex to Pennylane and Malibou — is in the spreadsheet below, with the stage, round size, and business model for each one.

The best part is below.

Members get the full breakdown plus every resource we publish: decks, fundraising playbooks, and the AI tools worth your time.

Build yourself to build what lasts.